“We should explore ideas like universal basic income to make sure that everyone has a cushion to try new ideas,”
A Universal Basic Income (UBI) is a concept that has gained quite a bit of attention recently. Finland has recently started experimenting with the idea and Canada and India are giving it consideration. Finland may be the first country to practice UBI, but it is hardly the first Government to do so. The city of Livorno, Italy began a UBI program in June of 2016.
It is interesting that supporters of UBI view it as the means of addressing income inequality in society today. It is interesting that this particular reporter terms it as an urgent necessity. Definitely something we must absolutely have.
In my estimation, UBI is nothing more than a repackaged welfare (see definition 3) program that is completely socialistic in nature. These ideas are nothing new and have been around for thousands of years. Consider the account from Mark 14:3-8 in which some self-righteous people where quite upset at what they considered a waste of money.
It is interesting to me that we hear very little about the fact that Jesus was in the home of Simon, a leper, when this story is recounted. Or the fact that the woman that brought the box of alabaster apparently had the resources to possess it, and yet she also came to the house of the leper (something a person of wealth would not normally do). But these are thoughts for another time.
The point I’d like to get to in the account is that there were those that pondered the thought that the ointment might have been sold for more than three hundred pence and the proceeds given to the poor. Basically welfare. Socialism. Sell the goods of the rich, and give them to the poor. A concept put forth by the Jewish culture some 2,000+ years ago.
As long as there has been inequality in the world, which Spiritually occurred about the instant that Adam took a bite of the forbidden fruit, and Physically has been since about 30 seconds after Adam and Eve were expelled from the Garden of Eden, mankind has been looking for ways to make things equal again.
Of course in doing so we have been ignoring the words of Jesus when he answered those very same self-righteous distractors with:
“6 And Jesus said, Let her alone; why trouble ye her? she hath wrought a good work on me. 7 For ye have the poor with you always, and whensoever ye will ye may do them good: but me ye have not always.”
I relish the fact that Jesus told them that (basically) they could do good for the poor whenever they wanted to. I kind of feel the same way about those crying out about inequality today. No one is stopping you from helping the poor and you don’t need to wait on anyone else to start.
The interesting thing about all of these social experiments to me is that the terms are all relative. Compared to most (or perhaps even all) of my wife’s family, we are very rich. However, compared to the people that live just six miles down the road from me, I might be considered poor (the houses in the community six miles down the road average $2,750,000.00 per home. About 7.37 times the cost of my home). And those folks could even be considered poor when contrasted to Mr. Zuckerberg.
Another interesting thing to me is that Jesus actually said that those that would inherit the kingdom of heaven, would be poor in spirit (Matthew 5:3). And with good reason too. God cannot help you if you are rich. The rich people of the world don’t run to God every night asking for their next meal or a place to lay their head. Only the poor people do that. Sometimes we lose our dependency upon God because we become too rich for him. We no longer need his help. We are self-sufficient without him and are happy to keep him on the shelf in the event that bad times come our way.
And yet we still feel like we need to play social games with society. We need to wipe out inequality.
Alright, I’ll play along. I’ve got a proposition for Mr. Zuckerberg:
Hey Mark, if you’re reading (and I know you’re not) let’s try a small scale UBI experiment right here at home.
I currently make a little over $130,000.00 USD/year. I’ll use that as a round number. I have (roughly) six years to retirement (I could conceivably retire earlier, but lets go to minimum retirement age).
But obviously I can’t do that on my present income. I would, of course, still need to meet my basic family expenses, for six years at my current salary that would be $780,000.00, I’d have the cost of the yacht, about $750,000.00, and I’d have the operating expenses of the yacht itself, lets estimate $200,000.00/year or $1,200,000.00 for six years. That would be $2,730,000.00. We could just round that up to $3,000,000.00.
Why doesn’t Facebook hire me for a $3,000,000.00 USD contract for six years (I’d bring some diversity to the company since I’m sure you’d agree my political, social, and religious views are different than your own) and I’ll become an ambassador traveling around interviewing people about their situation in life, compiling statistics on exactly what a correct UBI would amount to, as well as exploring the mechanics of such a plan to see if it could realistically be met. At the end of the six years I’d sail off into retirement, and you could evaluate just how well your $3,000,000.00 was spent. A social experiment and you get an employee out of the deal as well!
I’ll be waiting for your call ………………….